AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1245 MHz
  • Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
  • Around 57% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 896
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 8824
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 8824
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 35607
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 23 April 2019
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Pipelines 1408 vs 896
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 vs 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 vs 8824
Geekbench - OpenCL 45724 vs 35607

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
8824
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
45724
35607
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 8824
Geekbench - OpenCL 45724 35607
PassMark - G3D Mark 6157
PassMark - G2D Mark 325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 129.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1047.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 346.498
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2944

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 14 TU117
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 23 April 2019
Place in performance rating 400 458
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 1245 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) 69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) 4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.083 TFLOPS 2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 896
Pixel fill rate 46.40 GPixel/s 39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s 69.72 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 4700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5