AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 8824
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 8824
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 35607
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 896 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 8824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 8824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 vs 35607 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 8824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 8824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | 35607 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6157 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2944 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 458 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1245 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | 69.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.462 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | 2.231 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1408 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 69.72 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |