AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 347.3x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 9538
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 9538
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 13 September 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 9538 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1408
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53285 vs 45724
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53285 vs 45724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 9538 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | 53285 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12678 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 450 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 230 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro S7000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
