AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- 1187.6x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 234 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1673
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1673
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 465
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 5590
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 234 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1673 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 465 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 5590 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1673 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 | 465 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 5590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 10 | GK104 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 3 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 294 | 735 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 234 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 11.0" (27.9 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Two 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 384 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |