AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1096 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1176 MHz
- 5907.7x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 247
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 3400
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1096 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1176 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 247 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 3400 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 | 247 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 3400 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10716 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM107 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 294 | 770 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
