AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 66166.7x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 130 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 128 MB
- 23.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 152
- 56.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 124
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 152 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 124 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 205 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 | 152 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Curie |
Code name | Navi 10 | NV41 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 294 | 1070 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |