AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- 8744.5x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4096x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 312
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 2880
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 312 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 2880 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 205 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 | 312 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 2880 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Navi 10 | GM107 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 294 | 827 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |