AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 93% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1736.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 vs 800
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15321 vs 8953
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69416 vs 44039
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 10445
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 10445
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 vs 800 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15321 vs 8953 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69416 vs 44039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 vs 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 vs 10445 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 | 800 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15321 | 8953 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69416 | 44039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 10445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3959 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Grenada |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $329 |
Place in performance rating | 192 | 297 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |