AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 93% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 1736.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 vs 800
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15321 vs 8953
  • Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69416 vs 44039
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 10445
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 10445
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 Nov 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1930 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 277.9 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 205 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 926 vs 800
PassMark - G3D Mark 15321 vs 8953
Geekbench - OpenCL 69416 vs 44039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11065 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11065 vs 10445

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
Pipelines 2560 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3353
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
926
800
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15321
8953
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
69416
44039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11065
10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11065
10445
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5700 AMD Radeon R9 390
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 926 800
PassMark - G3D Mark 15321 8953
Geekbench - OpenCL 69416 44039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11065 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11065 10445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 607.381
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3959

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 AMD Radeon R9 390

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Navi 10 Grenada
Launch date 19 Nov 2019 18 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $329
Place in performance rating 192 297
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1930 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 36 40
Core clock speed 1243 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.893 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 2560
Pixel fill rate 123.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 277.9 GTexel/s 160.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 205 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,120 gflops
Stream Processors 2560

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 12 inches (305 mm) 275 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 512 bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore