AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1725 MHz
2x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 752
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15228 vs 10143
Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69098 vs 55386

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz vs 1725 MHz
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1280
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark	921 vs 752
PassMark - G3D Mark	15228 vs 10143
Geekbench - OpenCL	69098 vs 55386

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1243 MHz
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 205 Watt
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11065
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11065

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1530 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 205 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 vs 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 vs 11065

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3357

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

921

752

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

15228

10143

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

69098

55386

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

13569

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

13569

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3357
PassMark - G2D Mark	921	752
PassMark - G3D Mark	15228	10143
Geekbench - OpenCL	69098	55386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11065	13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11065	13569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		178.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1940.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		102.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		802.026
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4669

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 10	TU116
Launch date	19 Nov 2019	22 Nov 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$799
Place in performance rating	194	269
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	1725 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	555.8 GFLOPS (1:16)	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	17.79 TFLOPS (2:1)	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	8.893 TFLOPS	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	1280
Pixel fill rate	123.5 GPixel/s	55.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s	138.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	205 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	6600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	12 inches (305 mm)	9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Width	Dual-slot	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	192 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6