AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2091x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3684
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 698
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 7915
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3684 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 698 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 7915 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3360
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3360
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 11065
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 4193 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 698 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 7915 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 11804 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 8 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 194 | 241 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 224.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
IntelArc A530M
