AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 343
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15228 vs 8366
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69098 vs 68305
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 10140
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 10140
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1930 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Texture fill rate 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 921 vs 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 15228 vs 8366
Geekbench - OpenCL 69098 vs 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11065 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11065 vs 10140

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 205 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 205 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3351
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
921
343
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15228
8366
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
69098
68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11065
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11065
10140
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5700 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 921 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 15228 8366
Geekbench - OpenCL 69098 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11065 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11065 10140
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU106
Launch date 19 Nov 2019 27 May 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $799
Place in performance rating 194 325
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1930 MHz 1215 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1243 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.893 TFLOPS 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 2304
Pixel fill rate 123.5 GPixel/s 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 277.9 GTexel/s 175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 205 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 10800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 12 inches (305 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None
Width Dual-slot IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6