AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 2433.5x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43810 vs 27108
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 8931
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 8931
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 784
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 6559
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 vs 27108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 784 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 6559 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 205 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 27108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 784 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 6559 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | Polaris 22 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 146 | 327 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
