AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1670 MHz
- 2080.1x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 12021
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 12021
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 12021 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3714
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3714
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3364
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3364
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 5034 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP106 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 146 | 276 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |