AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 4694.3x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- 2800x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43810 vs 7917
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 3948
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 3948
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 3335
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 408
- 7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 2522
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 vs 7917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3335 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 408 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 2522 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 205 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 7917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3335 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 408 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 2522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 10 | GK106 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 146 | 864 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 928 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |