AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 2724.5x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 6912
- 141.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 117
- 34.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 108.2
- 28.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 119.7
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 119.7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 3714
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3364
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 3364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 6710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 6703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 119.7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 10 | GK104 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 8 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 146 | 887 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 797 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 771 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |