AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 10140
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 10140
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 343
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 8366
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 8366 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 43810
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 43810 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 68305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 8366 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 146 | 325 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.20 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 77.76 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 10800 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
