AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 9258
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 9258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 15 October 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7710 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34853 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3785 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 15 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 335 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1284 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1168 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
