AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 705 MHz
- 3.3x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 961.8x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 8124
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1792
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 23 | GK110B |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 28 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 269 | 394 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $1,580 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 876 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 705 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |