AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 705 MHz
  • 3.3x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 961.8x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 375 Watt
  • 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 8124
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 8124
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2413
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2413
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 28 May 2014
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 705 MHz
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 375 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

  • 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1792
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Pipelines 2x 2880 vs 1792
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
2226
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 2226
PassMark - G3D Mark 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark 656
Geekbench - OpenCL 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 309.857
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 17055

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 23 GK110B
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 28 May 2014
Place in performance rating 269 394
Launch price (MSRP) $2,999
Price now $1,580
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 6.46

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 876 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 705 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 2x 2880
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 338 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 375 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 5760
Floating-point performance 2x 5,046 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None Two 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 672 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA