AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and AMD Radeon RX 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 683
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 11959
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20988 vs 14115
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20988 vs 14115
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 60737
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 21 Jan 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 vs 683 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19881 vs 11959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 vs 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 vs 14115 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 60737 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 3717
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 3717
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 3357
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | AMD Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 | 683 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19881 | 11959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 19735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 19735 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 60737 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Navi 10 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 21 Jan 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 108 | 125 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1130 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | 6.390 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 10300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
