AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 47% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1410 MHz
Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 824
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 16168
Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 88582

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jun 2021 vs 17 October 2018
Core clock speed	2075 MHz vs 1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	2507 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Pipelines	3840 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	936 vs 824
PassMark - G3D Mark	19881 vs 16168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3350
Geekbench - OpenCL	131707 vs 88582

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

2.6x lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 450 Watt
7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 20988
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 20988

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	22615 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	22615 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

936

824

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19881

16168

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20988

22615

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20988

22615

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3350

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

131707

88582

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6800	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G2D Mark	936	824
PassMark - G3D Mark	19881	16168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20988	22615
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20988	22615
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3350
Geekbench - OpenCL	131707	88582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		252.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3729.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		27.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		154.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1303.435
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		8875

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6800	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 21	TU106
Launch date	8 Jun 2021	17 October 2018
Launch price (MSRP)	$2249	$499
Place in performance rating	108	140
Price now		$499.99
Type		Desktop
Value for money (0-100)		42.76
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2507 MHz	1620 MHz
Compute units	60
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	1410 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1203 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	38.51 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	19.25 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3840	2304
Pixel fill rate	240.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	601.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	175 Watt
Transistor count	26800 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Height	50 mm (2 inches)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	229 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Width	120 mm (4.7 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6