AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19919 vs 17107
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 88335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19919 vs 17107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 88335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 934
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 20988
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 20988
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 20988 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 971 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19919 | 17107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 88335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 304.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4024.711 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.542 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.654 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8754 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 21 | GA106 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $329 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 127 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 13250 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |