AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 239.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 643
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 16500
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 105640
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 239.0 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 vs 643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19881 vs 16500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 105640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3840
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 20988
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 20988
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 20988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 20988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 | 643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19881 | 16500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 26045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 26045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 105640 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 108 | 119 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1245 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | 15.30 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | 119.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 239.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
