AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1132 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1628 MHz
- 1299.6x more texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1696 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 888
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20988 vs 19663
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20988 vs 19663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1132 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1628 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1696 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 888 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 vs 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 vs 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 19919
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 vs 131707
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 19919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 vs 131707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 888 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19919 | 20021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 160720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Volta |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 27 March 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $8,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 108 | 94 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1696 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
