AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 13022x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
- 11.4x more pipelines: 3840 vs 336
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 11 October 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 336 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 2786
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 2786
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2243
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 11 October 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 531 | 1081 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 336 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 1,950 million |
| Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 210 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 108.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 3400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
