AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and AMD Radeon Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 8706.3x more texture fill rate: 498.0 GTexel/s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
- 5.5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 704
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 2475
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 2475
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3343
- 9.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122443 vs 13035
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 13 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s vs 57.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 704 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122443 vs 13035 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- 11.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 400 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122443 | 13035 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Owl |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 427 | 894 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 996.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 31.87 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.94 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 704 |
Pixel fill rate | 199.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s | 57.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 4,940 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |