AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro S9000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 343.5x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.896 vs 9.541
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 486.804 vs 275.278
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 1.886
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 30.049
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 100.658 vs 91.842
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 24 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 vs 9.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 vs 275.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 vs 1.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 30.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 vs 91.842 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 2428
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 444
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3274
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 vs 2428 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD FirePro S9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | 5059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 9.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 275.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 1.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 30.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 91.842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD FirePro S9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Tahiti |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 24 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $2,499 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 686 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |