AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1858
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 377
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14545 vs 9416
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2296
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 2296
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 vs 1858 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14545 vs 9416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 2296 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | 1858 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14545 | 9416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 810 | 600 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | 19.50 GP/s |
Stream Processors | 640 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 39.01 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio |