AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3644 vs 2428
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 494 vs 444
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 14535
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 25.896
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 vs 486.804
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 2.503
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 53.111
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 100.658
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3274
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3644 vs 2428 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 494 vs 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 14535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 vs 25.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 vs 486.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 vs 2.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 vs 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 vs 100.658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 3274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | 3644 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 494 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | 57671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1808 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $99 |
| Place in performance rating | 812 | 520 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Price now | $104.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | 14/16 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
| Stream Processors | 640 | 896/1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
