AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 85% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 1967x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 398
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 87
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2505
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2505

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2428 398
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 87
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2505

Compare specifications (specs)