AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 778 MHz
• 794x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 43.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1872
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 418
• Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 7872
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.896 vs 22.161
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 2.125
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 47.218
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 100.658 vs 75.212
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3117
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 486.804
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 vs 2524
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3398 vs 3274
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 vs 2524
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3398 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2428 1872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 418
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14535 7872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 22.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 781.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 2.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 47.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 75.212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3117

Compare specifications (specs)