AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 736 MHz
980.7x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 35.3 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1572
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3322
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3322

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 14 May 2011
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 736 MHz
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s vs 35.3 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2428 vs 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 447 vs 444
Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27378 vs 14535
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2879 vs 2524
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3372 vs 3274
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2879 vs 2524
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3372 vs 3274

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	447 vs 444
Geekbench - OpenCL	27378 vs 14535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2879 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3372 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2879 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3372 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2428

1572

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

444

447

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14535

27378

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

2879

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3372

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3322

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

2879

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3372

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3322

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	2428	1572
PassMark - G2D Mark	444	447
Geekbench - OpenCL	14535	27378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	3372
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	3372
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3322

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Lexa	GF114
Launch date	27 May 2019	14 May 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	812	598
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	736 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	35.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,950 million
Floating-point performance		847.9 gflops
Pipelines		288
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	6.6" (168 mm)	210 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	91.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3828 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)