AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 383.1x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 430
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 11366
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 32.922
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 100.658 vs 67.311

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

• Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3987 vs 2428
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.318 vs 25.896
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 681.141 vs 486.804
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 vs 2.503
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 2524
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 3274
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 2524
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2428 3987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14535 11366
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 67.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3352

Compare specifications (specs)