AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 584.8x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 2524
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3274
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 2524
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Polaris | Pascal |
| Code name | Lexa | GP107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 812 | 532 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
