AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3718 vs 2727
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 9.718
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 830.773 vs 738.1
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 0.867
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 27.153
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 118.756
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 9 September 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3718 vs 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 vs 9.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 vs 738.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 vs 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 118.756 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
| Pipelines | 1600 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 2,460 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3718 | 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | 655 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17711 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | 9.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | 738.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | 118.756 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Baffin | Cypress |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 9 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $3,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 587 | 627 |
| Price now | $259.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIFirePro M7740
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760
