AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 2x 320
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5583 vs 822
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 779 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5583 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5583 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Ellesmere | RV670 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 470 | 344 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 669 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |