AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs ATI Radeon X1800 GTO²
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and ATI Radeon X1800 GTO² videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 20.3x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 990 MHz
- 39.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5586 vs 141
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 1 March 2006 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 990 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5586 vs 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 vs 415 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1800 GTO²
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon X1800 GTO² |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5586 | 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon X1800 GTO² | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | R500 |
Code name | Ellesmere | R520 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 1 March 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 470 | 379 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 321 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 31.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |