AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs ATI Radeon X1900 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and ATI Radeon X1900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 17.6x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 6.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 38.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5586 vs 146
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 409
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 1 May 2006 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 6.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5586 vs 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 vs 409 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1900 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon X1900 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5586 | 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | 409 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | ATI Radeon X1900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | R500 |
Code name | Ellesmere | R580 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 1 May 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 470 | 386 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 384 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |