AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 10972
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 588
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3178.443
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.925 vs 16.732
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 173.59
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 11029
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 11029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 vs 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 vs 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 vs 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 173.59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 vs 1195.863
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 7164
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 7164
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 vs 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 7164 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | 588 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $6,999 |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 158 |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |