AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.128 vs 16.925
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 vs 16.925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | 21.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Grenada |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 3 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $1,399 |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 247 |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |