AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 3.6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 20x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 405
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 4643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 4643 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 827 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4643 | 19986 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 22 | TU102 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 18 December 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 252 | 90 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5000 million | 18,600 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |