AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5635 vs 5081
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 vs 5081 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 338
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 935
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2095 vs 1935
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2095 vs 1935
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 2380
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 2380
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 vs 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 2380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 399 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 1191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Oland | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 895 | 644 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |