AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5635 vs 4466
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 958
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 958
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2304
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5635 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2380 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2380 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 47% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 338
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 935
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1935
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1935
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 338
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 vs 935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 vs 1935

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
338
569
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
935
1461
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5635
4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1935
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1935
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2380
958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2380
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
2304
Name AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G2D Mark 338 569
PassMark - G3D Mark 935 1461
Geekbench - OpenCL 5635 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1935 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1935 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2380 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2380 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 2304

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Oland Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 5 May 2015 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 895 790
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops 883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s 55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync