AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5635 vs 4466
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 958
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 958
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2304
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 vs 4466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 338
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 935
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1935
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1935
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 vs 1935 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 569 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 1461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 4466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Oland | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 895 | 790 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |