AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1290
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 1290 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 921
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 5827
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 1645
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3157 vs 1677
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 1645
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3157 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 vs 921 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 5827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 921 | 1432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5827 | 7182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3157 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Oland | Skylake GT3e |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1201 | 953 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |