AMD Radeon R5 A330 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 A330 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 A330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 9.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20041 vs 2049
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 13 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20041 vs 2049 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 A330
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 A330 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20041 | 2049 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 A330 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Exo | GF108 |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 13 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1099 | 1459 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $299 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 640 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 10.24 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |