AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 12
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 144.0 gflops
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2899 vs 886
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 3.525
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 35.665
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.215
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 2.987
- 10.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 4.154
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 488
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 579
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1122
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 488
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 579
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1122
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 144.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2899 vs 886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 vs 3.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 35.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 vs 0.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 vs 2.987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 4.154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1122 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 500
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2899 | 886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 3.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 35.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 2.987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 4.154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1122 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 299 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Wani | Apollo Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1555 | 1645 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 144.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |