AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
  • 2.9x better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 549 vs 479
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 141
  • Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4157 vs 2229
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 999
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 999
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 October 2015 vs 1 October 2012
Pipelines 320 vs 96
Floating-point performance 684.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 549 vs 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 vs 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 4157 vs 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 vs 999

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 1114
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1716
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 1114
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1716
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2333 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3257 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2333 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3257 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
549
479
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
577
141
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4157
2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1080
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1114
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1716
3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1080
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1114
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1716
3257
Name AMD Radeon R5 M335 NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark 549 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 4157 2229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1114 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1716 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1114 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1716 3257

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M335 NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Exo GF117
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date 21 October 2015 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1043 1206
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1070 MHz
Compute units 5
Core clock speed 1070 MHz
Floating-point performance 684.8 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 96
Texture fill rate 21.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed 1.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus