AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 4.9x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 20x more pipelines: 320 vs 16
• 19.6x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 649 vs 347
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 194
• 9.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5084 vs 538
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.812 vs 8.712
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.981 vs 0.931
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.55 vs 7.36
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 65.872 vs 12.009
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1087 vs 754
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1087 vs 754

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 144.604
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1157
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 2212
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1157
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 2212

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	649 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	516 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5084 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.812 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	144.604 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.981 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.55 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.872 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 2392

Compare specifications (specs)