AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5652 vs 4157
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2089 vs 1716
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2089 vs 1716
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 800 vs 549
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1080
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1080
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 21 October 2015 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5652 vs 4157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 vs 1716 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 800 vs 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 vs 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 vs 1080 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 21.4 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 547.2 gflops
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1114 vs 1055
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1114 vs 1055
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops vs 547.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 vs 1055 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5652 | 4157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 1716 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 577 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 800 | 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | 1080 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M435 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Jet | Exo |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 21 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1286 | 1043 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 1070 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1070 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 684.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 21.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |