AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
- 43.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2x 1152 vs 768
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,470 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.396 vs 4.223
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1152 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,470 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.396 vs 4.223 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 260 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 | 7.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 260 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | GK104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 17 December 2013 | 19 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 555 | 877 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2x 2,470 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 1152 |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Core clock speed | 1006 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 2x 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |