AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel HD Graphics 5600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and Intel HD Graphics 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 2264
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 463
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16225 vs 2872
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 1598
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3330
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 1598
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3330
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 vs 2264 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 vs 463 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16225 vs 2872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | Intel HD Graphics 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 2264 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | 463 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16225 | 2872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3330 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Tobago | Broadwell GT2 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 634 | 746 |
| Price now | $146.65 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,300 million |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro S7150
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
