AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A265 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- 11.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 2x 800 vs 384
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,000.0 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1990 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1132 vs 994
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 468
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1132 vs 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 468 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A265
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | 1132 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6925 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 A265 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Opal | R700 |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 7 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 453 | 244 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $420 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 956 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |